Spinal Cord Stimulation

Certain types of chronic pain are caused by irritation of the nervous system. These so-called neuropathic pains often manifest as pain in the lower back or the legs.

According to studies of the German Pain Association e.V. and the German Pain Society e.V.  with 69% back pain is the most common kind of chronic pain. 8 to 10 million Germans live with chronic back pain. The American National Institutes of Health (NIH) estimate that more than 10% of the US population are affected by chronic pain.

Such pain can often be treated by physiotherapy, surgery, or alternative therapies. In cases where no other therapy is effective in reducing pain electrical stimulation of the spinal cord or the dorsal root ganglia can help (Dones & Levi 2018; Hunter et al., 2018).

For this purpose electrodes are implanted in the space above the spinal cord or in the vicinity of the spinal ganglia and connected to stimulation generators. The electrical stimulation pulses delivered to the tissue provide relief from pain sensation.

There are already a number of commercially available and clinically approved neurostimulators for spinal cord stimulation. About 15,000 patients receive such an implant every year. Spinal cord stimulation is currently the most commonly used form of neurostimulation.

Some implant systems are already able to work in a so-called closed loop with a small number of channels. In these cases stimulation intensity is adjusted either to the body position (Denison & Litt, 2014) or to measured electrical nerve activity (Russo et al., 2018). At the same time the numbers of channels of the clinically approved systems continuously.

High-channel and more complex closed-loop interactions with the nerve tissue could probably further improve therapeutic efficiency.

The CorTec electrodes, especially the flat °AirRay Grid Electrodes are suitable for spinal cord stimulation. As components of complete systems they can be customized and optimized in high-resolution designs to the application at hand. This provides greater spatial resolution of the area to be stimulated, which can help to hit the pain mediating areas and to develop new and more accurate therapies.

Applying °AirRay electrodes in conjunction with the Brain Interchange System also offers the option of combining specially designed electrode designs with long-term closed-loop pain therapy: The Brain Interchange technology is able to respond to neural activity and adjust the stimulation accordingly.

With its high number of channels, combined with the ability to both record and stimulate at all contacts, the Brain Interchange System provides maximum technical flexibility for a therapy that can adapt to the needs of the patient.

The CorTec °AirRay electrodes can be used in a variety of designs in scientific studies and as components of complete therapeutic systems. The Brain Interchange System is currently under development. Initial clinical pilot studies are in preparation to demonstrate safety and functionality of the system.

Further Readings

Scientific Literature

Spinal Cord Stimulation

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain: Current Trends and Future Applications.

Dones I, Levi V.

Brain Sci. 2018 Jul 24;8(8). pii: E138. doi: 10.3390/brainsci8080138. Review.

Dorsal root ganglion Stimulation

DRG FOCUS: A Multicenter Study Evaluating Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation and Predictors for Trial Success.

Hunter CW, Sayed D, Lubenow T, Davis T, Carlson J, Rowe J, Justiz R, McJunkin T, Deer T, Mehta P, Falowski S, Kapural L, Pope J, Mekhail N.

Neuromodulation. 2018 Aug 7. doi: 10.1111/ner.12796. [Epub ahead of print]

Closed-Loop Stimulation

Effective Relief of Pain and Associated Symptoms With Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation System: Preliminary Results of the Avalon Study.

Russo M, Cousins MJ, Brooker C, Taylor N, Boesel T, Sullivan R, Poree L, Shariati NH, Hanson E, Parker J.

Neuromodulation. 2018 Jan;21(1):38-47. doi: 10.1111/ner.12684. Epub 2017 Sep 18.

Closed-loop neurostimulation: the clinical experience.

Sun FT, Morrell MJ.

Neurotherapeutics. 2014 Jul;11(3):553-63. doi: 10.1007/s13311-014-0280-3. Review.

Advancing neuromodulation through control systems: a general framework and case study in posture-responsive stimulation.

Denison T, Litt B.

Neuromodulation. 2014 Jun;17 Suppl 1:48-57. doi: 10.1111/ner.12170.

Get a Quote

We’re happy to help you realize your next project. Whether it is a complete implantable system design, an electrode or another component.

Please fill out the form below and our sales team will be in contact with you shortly.

SPECIFICATIONS

FEATURE 

Recording channels 

Sampling rate 

Sampling dynamic range 

High pass filter cut-off 

Low pass filter cut-off 

Amplifier band pass gain 

Band pass roll-off 

Reference


Stimulation 

Stimulation channels 

Current 

Current source 

Pulse width 

Power supply 

Wireless data transmission 

Closed Loop latency

VALUE

32 

1 kHz 

16 bit (74 nV smallest increment) 

ca. 2 Hz 

325 Hz 

Adjustable: 100-750 

20 dB/dec 

Any (subset) of the recording channels selectable by software or one dedicated hard-wired additional contact 

Current-controlled, biphasic, rectangular, asymmetric stimulus pulses (cathodic amplitude with pulse width followed by an anodic counter pulse of 1/4x amplitude and 4x pulse width) 

 32 

Max. -6 mA / +1.5 mA (24 µA increments) within

 compliance voltage range of -11 V to +5 V 

Can be directed to any of the 32 electrode contacts 

Negative phase: 10 µs – 2,500 µs

Wireless inductive, 120-140 kHz

Bi-directional, radio frequency in 2400-2483.5 MHz band ≤ 40 ms