Minimally invasive endovascular electrodes

– a possible alternative to surgically implanted surface electrodes?

Wouldn’t it be great if we could reliably measure our brain’s activities without the need to open the skull? An Australian team is exploring this possibility by adapting a technology from cardiology: A stent, inserted through a catheter into a cerebral blood vessel in the brain. The team modified the stent so that it could function as an electrical recording electrode with various, independent channels.

But how good can such endovascular recordings get? Could they one day replace more conventional recording techniques that are used nowadays, e.g., in preparation for a brain surgery, or for brain-machine interfaces?

To answer this question, the team performed a systematic comparison of the signal qualities recorded from their “stentrodesTM“ and those from more conventional flat electrode arrays that were implanted onto the surface of the brain, either epidurally or subdurally. In this comparison, it is fair to assume that the spatial characteristics of the electrodes matter. So, CorTec custom-designed flat electrode arrays for this purpose that had exactly the same or only slightly larger or smaller diameters as the endovascular electrodes.

The electrode type that tended to perform best in the authors’ comparison (esp. signal to-noise-ratio) was the subdural type. That does not come as a big surprise, since it is closest to the electrically active neurons and there is no dura or blood vessel wall separating it from the neural tissue. What was surprising, however, was that the differences between all electrode types were quite small and, actually, not statistically significant. The study concludes that the exact placement of electrodes, be it subdurally, epidurally, or even endovascularly, does not matter very much for signal quality.

Therefore, the authors argue that for medical use, especially for implanted neuromodulation  devices, one may consider the least invasive options for placing recording electrodes, including their novel endovascular electrodes that do not require any brain surgery.

 

Citation:

John SE, Opie NL, Wong YT, Rind GS, Ronayne SM, Gerboni G, Bauquier SH, O’Brien TJ, May CN, Grayden DB, Oxley TJ. (2018): Signal quality of simultaneously recorded endovascular, subdural and epidural signals are comparable. Sci Rep. 2018 May 30;8(1):8427. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26457-7. Erratum in: Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 27;8(1):17469.

 


Learn more about possible applications with our °AirRay Grid Electrodes

Further readings in User Stories:

The Brain Interchange System for Stroke Rehabilitation

We are again featured in the latest edition of Open Access Government  – more specifically...

A Software Interface for Developing Next Generation Neurotherapies

Closed-Loop Platform for Neurotherapy – NIH-funded Project for Stroke Rehabilitation   The first “brain pacemakers”,...
brain computer interface illustration human brain

Neuroprosthetics review highlights need for new hardware

A group of authors from the University of Bordeaux has assessed the state of the...

A promising bioelectronics target in our neck

The carotid bodies are small glands sitting in the bifurcation of the carotid arteries (which...

Contact

Do you have any questions regarding our Company, our Products or our Technology?
We are happy to receive your message!

Get a Quote

We’re happy to help you realize your next project. Whether it is a complete implantable system design, an electrode or another component.

Please fill out the form below and our sales team will be in contact with you shortly.

SPECIFICATIONS

FEATURE 

Recording channels 

Sampling rate 

Sampling dynamic range 

High pass filter cut-off 

Low pass filter cut-off 

Amplifier band pass gain 

Band pass roll-off 

Reference


Stimulation 

Stimulation channels 

Current 

Current source 

Pulse width 

Power supply 

Wireless data transmission 

Closed Loop latency

VALUE

32 

1 kHz 

16 bit (74 nV smallest increment) 

ca. 2 Hz 

325 Hz 

Adjustable: 100-750 

20 dB/dec 

Any (subset) of the recording channels selectable by software or one dedicated hard-wired additional contact 

Current-controlled, biphasic, rectangular, asymmetric stimulus pulses (cathodic amplitude with pulse width followed by an anodic counter pulse of 1/4x amplitude and 4x pulse width) 

 32 

Max. -6 mA / +1.5 mA (24 µA increments) within

 compliance voltage range of -11 V to +5 V 

Can be directed to any of the 32 electrode contacts 

Negative phase: 10 µs – 2,500 µs

Wireless inductive, 120-140 kHz

Bi-directional, radio frequency in 2400-2483.5 MHz band ≤ 40 ms