Recording quality of CorTec cuff electrode excels in comparison with other commercial and self-made alternatives

Creating viable electric interfaces for delicate nerve structures is a real challenge –  especially if they are to enable communication with particularly small nerves which are only as thick as a human hair.

In an attempt to find the best technical and least costly option the authors of a recently pre-published study compared the performance of different cuff technologies. The team at the Feinstein Institute, New York, used two commercially available electrode types – one of them the Sling Cuff electrode from CorTec – and a handmade alternative based on microwires.

As part of the  systematic comparison, Falcone et al. implanted all three electrode types in the left cervical vagus nerves of anesthetized mice which at only about 100 micrometers is particularly thin. In the anesthetized state they recorded electrical potentials from the nerves for a minimum of 30 minutes.

With regard to their recording quality the Sling Cuffs from CorTec performed significantly better than all other alternatives from what showed the subsequent analysis of the signal-to-noise ratio. And this even though the signal sizes measured as peak-to-peak amplitude were comparable in all electrode types.

As the first systematic direct comparison of three completely different electrode technologies performed in the very same lab, this independent study offers deeper insights into the advantages and disadvantages of different solutions, especially in the smallest dimensions of nerve structures.

 

Read the Paper:

Jessica D. Falcone, Tristan Liu, Laura Goldman, David D. Pogue, Malgorzata Straka, Loren Rieth, Chad E. Bouton, Harbaljit S. Sohal:
A wrappable microwire electrode for awake, chronic interfacing with small diameter autonomic peripheral nerves
bioRxiv 402925; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/402925

Further readings in User Stories:

The Brain Interchange System for Stroke Rehabilitation

We are again featured in the latest edition of Open Access Government  – more specifically...

A Software Interface for Developing Next Generation Neurotherapies

Closed-Loop Platform for Neurotherapy – NIH-funded Project for Stroke Rehabilitation   The first “brain pacemakers”,...
brain computer interface illustration human brain

Neuroprosthetics review highlights need for new hardware

A group of authors from the University of Bordeaux has assessed the state of the...

A promising bioelectronics target in our neck

The carotid bodies are small glands sitting in the bifurcation of the carotid arteries (which...

Contact

Do you have any questions regarding our Company, our Products or our Technology?
We are happy to receive your message!

Get a Quote

We’re happy to help you realize your next project. Whether it is a complete implantable system design, an electrode or another component.

Please fill out the form below and our sales team will be in contact with you shortly.

SPECIFICATIONS

FEATURE 

Recording channels 

Sampling rate 

Sampling dynamic range 

High pass filter cut-off 

Low pass filter cut-off 

Amplifier band pass gain 

Band pass roll-off 

Reference


Stimulation 

Stimulation channels 

Current 

Current source 

Pulse width 

Power supply 

Wireless data transmission 

Closed Loop latency

VALUE

32 

1 kHz 

16 bit (74 nV smallest increment) 

ca. 2 Hz 

325 Hz 

Adjustable: 100-750 

20 dB/dec 

Any (subset) of the recording channels selectable by software or one dedicated hard-wired additional contact 

Current-controlled, biphasic, rectangular, asymmetric stimulus pulses (cathodic amplitude with pulse width followed by an anodic counter pulse of 1/4x amplitude and 4x pulse width) 

 32 

Max. -6 mA / +1.5 mA (24 µA increments) within

 compliance voltage range of -11 V to +5 V 

Can be directed to any of the 32 electrode contacts 

Negative phase: 10 µs – 2,500 µs

Wireless inductive, 120-140 kHz

Bi-directional, radio frequency in 2400-2483.5 MHz band ≤ 40 ms