A software tool for optimizing peripheral motor stimulation

CorTec’s cuff electrodes have proven extremely helpful as interfaces for electrically interacting with the peripheral nervous system. The range of possible applications is vast. Cuff sizes, shapes and contact arrangements can be tailored to the specific target nerves, and the electrodes can both, stimulate and record.

Nerve stimulation is often used for activating muscles, e.g. for restoring movements after paralysis. Peripheral motor nerves, however, usually contain a number of nerve fiber bundles that activate functionally different sets of muscles or muscle fiber groups. To elicit a specific movement, it is therefore not enough to stimulate the whole nerve with a conventional, single channel ring electrode. Rather, multiple smaller electrode contact sites are needed that are able to activate only a specific fraction of the nerve. To this end, CorTec has developed multi-channel cuff electrodes that have several contacts spaced around the circumference of the nerve.

But the challenges don’t end there. Unfortunately, the functional subsections of a given nerve are not visually discernable. So, whether or not an electrode contact is hitting the sweet spot for eliciting a given movement is basically a trial-and-error game. The researcher places the electrode at a given position, stimulates the contacts with various current intensities, and observes the resulting muscle activations or movements. If the stimulation does not produce the desired outcome, the electrode is moved on to another position, until, hopefully, the stimulation becomes successful. That is a tedious, time-consuming and error-prone task if performed manually, rendering experiments inefficient and increasing risks for complications due to prolonged surgery times.

An Italian-Swiss group around Silvestro Micera, a real expert in peripheral neuromodulation, has now developed a tool to make this process more efficient. They created a software that automatically evaluates electrode stimulation selectivity in real time. As a read-out for determining electrode sensitivity, electromyograms of the target muscles are used. The user can run a complete sensitivity index analysis through a graphical user interface, with the results being displayed immediately on a computer screen. On the basis of these results, electrode positions can be optimized swiftly and reliably.

The software is based on Matlab code and works with a commercially available neurostimulator (Tucker-Davis). The authors are happy to share the tool upon request.

Learn more about our °AirRay Cuff Electrodes and discover more User Stories.

Citation:

Strauss I, De Luca D., Panarese A.M., Bernini F., Gabisonia K., Petrini F.M., Recchia F.A., Raspopovic S., Micera S. (2021): A Software Tool for the Real-Time in Vivo Evaluation of Neural Electrodes’ Selectivity 10th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER) Virtual Conference, May 4-6, 2011, doi: 10.1109/NER49283.2021.9441334

Further readings in Technology and User Stories:

The Brain Interchange System for Stroke Rehabilitation

We are again featured in the latest edition of Open Access Government  – more specifically...

A Software Interface for Developing Next Generation Neurotherapies

Closed-Loop Platform for Neurotherapy – NIH-funded Project for Stroke Rehabilitation   The first “brain pacemakers”,...
brain computer interface illustration human brain

Neuroprosthetics review highlights need for new hardware

A group of authors from the University of Bordeaux has assessed the state of the...

A promising bioelectronics target in our neck

The carotid bodies are small glands sitting in the bifurcation of the carotid arteries (which...

Contact

Do you have any questions regarding our Company, our Products or our Technology?
We are happy to receive your message!

Get a Quote

We’re happy to help you realize your next project. Whether it is a complete implantable system design, an electrode or another component.

Please fill out the form below and our sales team will be in contact with you shortly.

SPECIFICATIONS

FEATURE 

Recording channels 

Sampling rate 

Sampling dynamic range 

High pass filter cut-off 

Low pass filter cut-off 

Amplifier band pass gain 

Band pass roll-off 

Reference


Stimulation 

Stimulation channels 

Current 

Current source 

Pulse width 

Power supply 

Wireless data transmission 

Closed Loop latency

VALUE

32 

1 kHz 

16 bit (74 nV smallest increment) 

ca. 2 Hz 

325 Hz 

Adjustable: 100-750 

20 dB/dec 

Any (subset) of the recording channels selectable by software or one dedicated hard-wired additional contact 

Current-controlled, biphasic, rectangular, asymmetric stimulus pulses (cathodic amplitude with pulse width followed by an anodic counter pulse of 1/4x amplitude and 4x pulse width) 

 32 

Max. -6 mA / +1.5 mA (24 µA increments) within

 compliance voltage range of -11 V to +5 V 

Can be directed to any of the 32 electrode contacts 

Negative phase: 10 µs – 2,500 µs

Wireless inductive, 120-140 kHz

Bi-directional, radio frequency in 2400-2483.5 MHz band ≤ 40 ms